Search / Use / Assess

1. In class I worked with Brooke and Tori
2. We chose the website when2meet because none of us have ever heard of this sight and it sounded intriguing.

3. First we were confused because none of us knew what this site was even about. So, as a user who happens to come across this site, there are no indications as to what it is about / what you are doing. Most of the type is the same size, not too much differentiation, my eyes go to the calendar first. "New Event Name" is the biggest element on the screen, which seems like it shouldn't be the first thing you read. The entire screen is cut almost in half by this black screen on the bottom that is for ads. Some of the ads are so bright and colorful I want to look at the ad more than the actual information on the screen. Eventually on the very top - there is a bar with two tabs you can click. "About When2meet" gives you the information you need as to what the site is about.
It says:
"When2meet.com helps you find the best time for a group to meet.
When2meet is compact, so that events can be created and accessed quickly.
When2meet is a free service. Anyone can create and participate in availability surveys at no cost. Ads help to cover some of the operating costs."

There is also a tutorial that is attached (that is about 8min long which is ridiculous to me)

I thought this info would be the most important thing to be on the first page, but instead we had to search for how to even work the site.

So with this info - the primary task is to select dates for availability - this is essentially sent out to people through Facebook Messenger or email where those individuals can select the times in which they are available. When they do - the calendar turns a light shade of pink to show "available" contrasting with a dark grey that indicates "not available".. Once everyone in the group selects their availability, they can schedule an optimal time for a meeting whether it be just one day or multiple days. It is pretty accessible, and straightforward.

Text also was somewhat distracting - usually only one line flowed all the way across the screen which broke up the page in a weird way.

Comments

Type 3: Sculpture

I wanted to focus on the main "Form One" and "Form Two" part within the reading. I decided to take two spherical shapes and have one be smaller as the underdeveloped twin and fill it with black ink. Both spheres have smaller orbs inside them signifying lifeforms. In the underdeveloped one, the orbs are drowning in black ink. Around the pedestal that Form Two is sitting on, there is black wire coming out of the bottom and winding upward as if it is attacking / trying to infect Form One hanging above. Form One I decided to leave clear with bright orbs inside with a tiny red / pink flake that can be seen if you look closely. These are just some of the images I took that I wanted to add to the blog, I have a lot more but I didn't want this post to be super long.

S.O.S Layout Assistance

The next project for Type 3 we had to design a product that people (student designers) could use to learn about a specific part of typography / typesetting. We were supposed to choose an aspect about type that we necessarily did not know ourselves / something we could have used when learning to typeset The Exegesis. After typesetting The Exegesis, I realized my biggest issue was margins and layout design. So, I teamed up with Brooke Cirone to develop a product that people can play with to help view text boxes in a manipulative and creative way. This helped me understand spatial value, and understanding that layouts don't just have to be boxes - they can be any shape you please. We also had to develop packaging, I wanted to create a box with a sticker to show the branding - but time and costs became a big issue. We chose a clear holder to hold all of the materials in that could essentially be packaged the way it came, with a handy dandy holder to place materials and can be easily s

Information Architecture - Website Research

TOY FIGHT Pros: - I was drawn to this page because it specifically related to the artists and who they were. They placed themselves first and who they were / what they were about before you saw the work. I thought that was strong because it allows the viewer to feel like they know the two artists - not just seeing the work without really knowing who is behind it. - Very creative - instead of photographs of to represent the artists, they decided to make little characters of themselves in a doll like form. - The sight is very vibrant and has bright colors for each page - They only have a few projects (which could be seen as a con) but only has the best of the best of their projects up - Interactivity when you move mouse around - the image shifts slightly in response to the mouse Cons: - Because there is so much going on - if there is a slow internet connection the site can lag and does not look as great - Patches of space - when you scroll down the next page should appe

The Beehive

Search This Blog